|
- Assisted the Hualapai Tribe, Grand Canyon National Park, and Lake Mead National Recreation Area to establish a partnership to cooperatively manage the 100 miles of Colorado River through Grand Canyon that forms their boundary.
- Helped a widely divergent committee of 26 stakeholders agree on a vision, mission, goals, and management objectives for improving the ecosystem of the Grand Canyon through the operation of Glen Canyon Dam.
- Planned and facilitated seven scoping meetings for the revision of the 1989 Colorado River Management Plan of Grand Canyon National Park, using dispute resolution techniques that turned a contentious process into a cooperative and collegial one. This also generated useful public input for the Park and enhanced relationships between the Park and its stakeholders.
- Designed and administered two expert panels for the revision of the 1989 Colorado River Management Plan that provided Grand Canyon National Park with opinions from academics, researchers, and practitioners on important and controversial subjects related to recreational use on the Colorado River.
- Developed and executed two stakeholder workshops, where stakeholders quantified their values and identified desirable trade-offs on controversial and contentious issues related to the revision of the 1989 Colorado River Management Plan.
- Helped Salt River Project and a community group to agree on a detailed landscape mitigation plan for a power plant expansion.
- Assisted several organizations to plan their future through effective strategic planning processes.
- Recruited volunteers to serve on an advisory committee that will implement a county health care program for homeless people. Also assisted the group in establishing its mission and objectives.
- Collaborated in the organization and execution of a successful two-week training program on local tax programs for visiting tax administrators from Bosnia-Herzegovina.
- Helped develop and lead a one-day process that identified workplace issues among 100 US Forest Service employees, ranked the issues in terms of priority among the employees, and produced five specific actions that could be implemented by the Forest Supervisor.
|
